Impossible Mad response. Not admitting without basis.
Of course it’s a Non-Human-Hate to me.
hands in the starry sky. SOS!!!
Cracking in 202202. The gist of the Process (Details are attached)
In 20220212, theURL (https://alien1961.xyz/) showed in 2 places of my Profile was changed to invalidnon-sense strings in my unaware.
*(1) Bio column: https://t.co/KWnglNMbHp → Error “There is no content to display“,
*(2) Website column: https://t.co/egF5SmZhlk → Error “The information not found“
In 20220213, I asked them to investigate the falsification and spoofing. (Ev-2)
I attached the falsified profile’s screenshot (Ev-1) and “My Number Card”’s photo.
20220215, 1st answer. (Ev-3) We won’t respond because your ownership is suspicious.
20220216, I protested. (Ev-2) I’m the owner!Site destruction (Cracking)!spoofing!
20220216, 2nd answer. (Ev-4) It isn’t a spoofing policy violation, so no touch.
20220217, I protested. (Ev-2) Site destruction (Cracking)!spoofing!
20220217, 3rd answer. (Ev-5) It isn’t a spoofing policy violation, so no touch.
Explanation
Cracking is the unfair use of a computer system by invading, destroying, or falsifying it.
I sued a Cracking. Cracking includes falsification and spoofing.
In short, they ignored my natural plea. This is terrorism by non-human treatment.
★★There can be no chance that the two URLs in the Bio column and Website column become meaningless at the same time.
That is, it must be Cracking.
★★★Rewriting anothers’ profile while unaware is a clear violation.
It’s naturally a violation of laws*, insults, self-determination right, portrait right, etc.
*Act on Prohibition of Unauthorized Computer Access, Act-No. 128 of August 13, 1999.
*Act on the Limitation of Liability for Damages of Specified Telecommunications Service Providers and the Right to Demand Disclosure of Identification Information of the Sender,
Act-No. 137 of November 30, 2001
Invalid stringification causes reference errors and damages the author’s credit.
So, it’s a concealment effect and defamation.
Profiles are originally important. Especially in my case, the URL is so.
Because Twitter has a character limit, I have to explain it on an external site.
This Cracking is an implicit threat.
Dared to do clearly illegal and useless cracking without subsequent action.
That is, the real aim is an implicit threat that “we know everything about you like this.”
★The way of this Cracking is, of course, “spoofing”.
I do repeat that it’s impossible the 2 URLs become non-sense at the same time.
Conclusion
●(1) Before the policy, a platform cannot ignore Cracking.
As mentioned above, Cracking is all illegal, so there is no justice for ignoring it.
Anyway, the only clue to detect the Cracker is the updated history of my profile.
Only Twitter holds the key. However, they won’t provide it. It’s irresponsibleidiotizing.
It’s a violation of Act-No. 137 due to their known and circulation of the falsified information.
Concealment of crime is naturally crime.
●(2) It cannot be said that it’s not a policy violation.
As follows, both hit the policy’s aim but don’t hit the specific example.
Can we call it “Not hit”? At least, it’s a policy flaw.
There are the following 2 policies in “Platform integrity and authenticity”.
★Impersonation policy
“another person is expressed by misleading methods or false information.”
★Platform manipulation and spam policy
“intended to artificially suppress information”, and
”platform manipulation to misleads others.”
●(3) Thus, Twitter’s answer is partial and inappropriate.
Also, sophisms such as “don’t hit” or “not qualified” are Japan-styleShut-out or Evasion.
In short, this is a conspiracy of a lawless society for me only.
It’s an impossible response so is a vital proof of global hate. Lawless the UN!!!
The UN_HRC ignored my report twice(2018,2021)!!!
It’s of course anti-treaty and discriminative.
(1)Each was serious contents.
Each was about deceptiveJapan in English as “consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of all human rights and all fundamental freedoms”.
2018reportwas a huge set of 17 documents in all cases.
20180711posted,20180716deliverd.
But all 3way(e-mail,EMS,FAX) shutted out!!! FAX was arrival confirmation only.
(3)★ The resolution is a treaty, and “the author is informed at each key stage” is stated.
“Each key stage” is ambiguous, but no matter what the bugs, they needed to contact me.
Stated notice of “final outcome” is necessary, so it’s surely anti-treaty.
●from Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007
The Complaint Procedure of the Human Right s Council is the only universal complaint procedure addressing all human rights and all fundamental freedoms in all United Nations Member States.
86. “victims oriented” and “conducted in a timely manner”
106. The complaint procedure shall ensure that both the author of a communication and the State concerned are informed of the proceedings at the following key stages: (a)When communication is deemed inadmissible by the Working Group on Communications or when it is taken up for consideration by the Working Group on Situations; or when communication is kept pending by one of the Working Groups or by the Council;
(b)At the final outcome.
(5)Therefore, no response can be said anti-treaty. Impossible response.
(6)The UN, a human rights founder, dared to discriminate against me.
It can only be explained as persecution.
(7)Madness of the Supreme Court of Japan that rejected this case.
(8)The member state’s obligations under the UN Charter
(Article 1)★The Purposes of the United Nations are: adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace
(Article 2)★All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
(Article 14) ★it deems likely to impair the general welfare
★situations resulting from a violation of the provisions of the present Charter
(Article 34)★might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute
★likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security
(Article 35)★Any Member of the United Nations may bringany dispute, or any situation of the nature referred to in Article 34, to the attention of the Security Council or of the General Assembly
●International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Article 2
1 Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinions, national or social origin, property, birth or another status.
2 Where not already provided for by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to adopt such laws or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to the rights recognized in the present Covenant.
3 ★Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violatedshall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
((b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy;
(c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.
